The loss and misunderstanding of education from fire protection

 In recent ten years, our country got a lot of development in the field of fire science education, to open fire, the fire control propaganda, the popular science education base of fire and fire obvious achievements volunteer team construction and so on. However, the improvement of public fire knowledge level lags behind the economic and social development. To make full use of the experience and lessons of the fire case, education public can be regarded as one of the most effective ways to improve the effectiveness of fire science popularization and reduce the loss of public life and property. Unfortunately, there are still missing and misconceptions in our fire safety education.

    Interpretation of the mistake: less from the public safety perspective to summarize fire lessons.

    After the fire, the fire department is often from the perspective of fire fighting and rescue, fire prevention, and less from the perspective of enterprise employees and the public fire safety education, which makes some valuable resource has not been fully utilized.

Typical fire: June 3, jilin baoyuanfeng poultry co., LTD. Fire.

Reinterpretation: this fire caused 121 employees to die, and the reason for the fire was only attributed to the closure of most workshop doors, and it was not comprehensive for enterprises to organize fire evacuation drills. There are, at least, the following reasons:

One, from the distribution room short circuit, spark around the fuel to heat that ammonia pipeline between physical explosion has the long period of time, during this time, if a small number of people in the early fire fighting and rescue, the majority of people to evacuate, it can not be dead so many people.

2. If an employee who fires a fire in the early stage immediately drops the fire extinguisher before the fire enters the stage of development, more people will be able to escape.

If there are more employees in the workshop like a woman in the workshop, the door to the cold storage in the adjacent workshop is open, and more people will escape from there.

Four, if the female worker is greeting other colleagues to escape with her, it is not only an employee who escapes from the refrigerator door.

Five, if workshop outside some at another in battle.love employees know, entered the stage of fierce fire, the fire has not helped,

 even more unstable, lead to more unnecessary casualties suzhou gas fire. JPG, that would not have to escape flow reverse and rushed into the fire.

    Typical fire: April 14, hubei xiangyang hotel fire.

    Reinterpretation: if the guest who escaped from the hotel shouted "fire" while escaping, knocking on the door of a nearby guest room could save several lives.

    Typical fire: June 13, suzhou gas company fire.

    Reinterpret: the only reason to return to the gas leakage is not enough, must investigate after the leakage of explosion-proof valve will shut down the line, a source of ignition gas is what, why after gas leakage field also appears some fire, gas leak after comprehensive office building staff why not evacuated. The cause of the fire, the fire control knowledge and skill levels of employees and their behavior after the fire must be serious investigation and interpretation, the conclusion, employees and the public fire safety education is a valuable resource